Hello Carol,

On Tuesday December 04 2018 21:18, you wrote to me:

 MV>> The question was to "Andrew and all running". You are running,
 MV>> you are part of "them". So now I am asking you.

 CS> Ok, but you should ask them as well, not just me.

You were the one bringing "personal issue" into the discussion. So I am asking
you.

 MV>>>> So... Suppose an invited guest brings a personal issue into the
 MV>>>> members only FTSC echo and refuses your request to drop it. How
 MV>>>> would you deal with that interuption of the smooth operation of
 MV>>>> the FTSC?

 CS> I have dealt with similar over the decades.  The frst was Cott Lang
 CS> (original Regade author) then many tothers, including some very
 CS> intersting ones when election coodinator for FN_SYSOP and some not
 CS> well behaved people.

I specifically asked about the private FTSC echo. It is different from most
other echos as it is a members and invited guests only echo.

 MV>> Suppose an invited guest brings a personal issue into the members
 MV>> only FTSC echo and refuses your request to drop it. How would you
 MV>> deal with

 CS> Best I can see is you accused Ward of being something like an infamous
 CS> African dictator and he objected.

Really? Did you actually see me use the word "dictator" in public or is your
judgement based on hearsay? Whatever happened, it was not me that brought the
alleged personal issue into th eprivate FTSC aera.

Anyway, I did not ask how you think I should have handled it. I am not a
candidate. You are, so I am asking you how YOU would handle it.

 CS> I would have taken that offline and worked it out.

How would you do that? "take it offline"? It takes two to tango. How do you do
that if the party concerns refuses to cooperate in "taking it offline"?


Cheers, Michiel

--- GoldED+/W32-MSVC 1.1.5-b20170303