Earl Croasmun -> Mimi Gallandt wrote:

 ->>>>  Oh, and you completely deleted the part where I pointed out that
 ->>>>  no one used the term "launder" or anything close to it.

 EC>> Nonsense, of course, since Mimi could not have responded to my
 EC>> response
 EC>> if I had not MADE a response.  You just make yourself look sillier
 EC>> and sillier when you say such nonsense.  You even QUOTED me to that
 EC>> effect!

 ->> You're being logical with him again, didn't I warn you about that not
 ->> working? :)

 EC> The actual term used wasn't even "launderer."  It was a
reference to his
 EC> "laundry."  That ordinarily wouldn't even be interpreted
as a PERSON at
 EC> all, but a business.  Klahn heard "laundry" and heard it
as a reference
 EC> to a specific person of a specific race based on HIS racial stereotypes.

Keeping in mind that I'm a Californian and that while none of the others
compare to San Francisco's All of the major cities (and some of the smaller
ones) have China towns, I suppose that if my mind were to jump to a race
affiliated with laundries I think I would think of the Chinese, not Blacks
by any means. Are commercial laundries in the East and South parts of the
country affiliated in any way with Blacks? If not why in the heck would
Klahn jump to such a bigoted conclusion? Oh, yeah, never mind. :)

 EC> So the racism was his.  Maybe that is why he reacts to logic the way a
 EC> vampire reacts to sunlight.

 EC> --- PCBoard (R) v15.3/M 10


-- 
L'Chaim,
Mimi

fcpnmimi(at)cox.net



So many books...so little time

--- Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Windows/20080213)