EC> And by you.  You asked.  All three answers stand.

-> Nope. I never said those things. So they were racist statements, but
-> on the part of someone else, never me

Note that you asked a question.  I gave three answers.  After I dealt
with your incoherent response, I pointed out that all three examples
stood.  Your answer was that they were racist statements but that you
never said them.  I waited to see if you were going to go back and play
word games, and sure enough you did.  And you couldn't even summon up
one brief moment of integrity to frame it as you miswording your
admission.  You felt you had to pretend that you didn't say it in the
first place.  Good gosh that was SO predictable!

 EC> Three lies in one sentence.  I didn't defend him, I quoted
 EC> your own words, and I on several occasions pointed out your
 EC> words as well as your denial that they were your words.  I

-> If you did, you lied.

That's about as meaningless as all your other whines, but this time it
is standing there as a naked assertion without your usual foolishness
for disguise.

-> ->>  Oh, and you completely deleted the part where I pointed out that
-> ->>  no one used the term "launder" or anything close to it.

Again, someone did.  But it gets more interesting in this new response,
when you insist that Richard never did.  If what you are saying is true
(always a long shot, admittedly), then you are confessing that you
altered one of his posts!  In September of last year you posted what you
presented as a verbatim quote, with fidonet quote markers and all, of a
post to you that referred to your cook and your laundry.

Were you lying then?  Or are you lying now?

Either way, as I pointed out to you some time back, YOU claimed it was a
racist stereotype.  In fact YOU claimed that it was a reference to a
SPECIFIC person of a SPECIFIC race.  The racism was in YOUR head, not in
the inkblots.

You, of course, will babble on and try to toss out diversions again.  No
one will be fooled but you.  Let's try a simple analogy.  Suppose Wilson
says something, and I respond "even a moron would see the problem with
that."  He comes back with "leave Klahn out of the thread."  I said
"moron" and he thought "Klahn."  Appropriate, of
course, but in that
hypothetical example it is Wilson, not me, who called you a moron.

Babble away.

--- PCBoard (R) v15.3/M 10