-=> IB Joe wrote to Dr. What <=-

 IJ> You have made a great argument for Section 230... I am aware of the
 IJ> fact private companies can do what they want.  I just feel that there
 IJ> must be some kind of litmus test to have the shield of Section 230.

There is.  But it's not followed: If you exert editorial control over the
content, you are a publisher and not protected under Section 230.

 IJ> I think there should be recourse and if there is any Government
 IJ> intervention it should side with "The People" and they should follow
 IJ> the rules of Section 230 to maintain their status.

Yes, there should.  Perhaps that's why Zuck was meeting with Trump.

Places like YouTube and Facebook should have their protection stripped because
they exerted editorial control, which leaves them open to many, many, many
lawsuits.


... Honesty pays, but not enough for some.
___ MultiMail/Linux v0.52

--- Mystic BBS/QWK v1.12 A47 2021/12/25 (Windows/32)