Earl Croasmun -> Bob Klahn wrote:
 EC>>> I gave three examples in response to your earlier question.
 EC>>>  You said (after your usual babbling) that all three
 EC>>>  examples would be racist, but you denied that you said any

 ->>  Uh... no... I said the last one was racist.

 EC> Yeah, I figured you would backtrack and try to weasel your words.


 EC>>>  of them.  And now you can deny ever saying THAT.  It was
 EC>>>  pretty funny when you fell back to that obvious lie in the
 EC>>>  Bosch thread, but now it has gotten old.  Just like your

 ->>  You dropped that BS back when I pointed out that you were
 ->>  creatively interpreting to defend a terrorist.

 EC> Three lies in one sentence.  I didn't defend him, I quoted your own
 EC> words, and I on several occasions pointed out your words as well as your
 EC> denial that they were your words.  I stopped beating the dead horse of
 EC> your credibility when the point had been clearly made and when you had
 EC> no defense.  If you want to call that "dropping" it, that
is about as
 EC> honest as your general twisting of words.

It is highly hypocritical of bigot Bob to accuse *YOU* of defending a
terrorist considering how he feels for Hamas, the PLO and all the other
false so called "palestinians".

 ->>  I will say this. If you call someone an oreo it will probably be
 ->>  racist

 EC> "Probably?"  Ha ha ha.  Leaving yourself future weasel-room?

Of course. :)

 ->>  if you call someone a poverty pimp it will probably be racist.

 EC> You hear "pimp" and you think of a specific race, huh? 
Sounds like the
 EC> racism is in your mind.

His bigotry simply oozes from him so that he can't hide it. It occurs to me
that the two most famous and successful "pimps" (we call them
madams) have been *WHITE* females; Heidi Fleise (sp?) and the Mayflower
Madam,
 Sydney Biddle Barrows.



 ->>  The "cook" reference was used by someone I am quite convinced
 ->>  intended it in a racist connotation.

 EC> You attached it in your mind to a specific person!


 ->>  Oh, and you completely deleted the part where I pointed out that
 ->>  no one used the term "launder" or anything close to it.

 EC> Nonsense, of course, since Mimi could not have responded to my response
 EC> if I had not MADE a response.  You just make yourself look sillier and
 EC> sillier when you say such nonsense.  You even QUOTED me to that effect!

You're being logical with him again, didn't I warn you about that not working? :)

-- 
L'Chaim,
Mimi

fcpnmimi(at)cox.net



It is a tremendous Mitzvah to always be happy!
 - Reb Nachman of Breslov

--- Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Windows/20080213)