Hi TOm,

Thom LaCosta wrote in a message to Richard Webb:

JS> I am curious about a few somethings.

JS> Are there any echos currently in the echolist where there is a
JS> dispute as to who is/should be the moderator or person in charge of
JS> that echo?


JS> Is there anyone that would object to the current Echolist and it's
JS> current entries?
 RW> Again, I point you to recent discussions in z1c.

TL> Well now....let me say a few things:

TL> The echolist is NOT part of or administered by FIdonet as a whole or
TL> any of its zones.

Understood that from docs I've read. AS I understand it this function
serves numerous ftn type networks. My only argument was that it is the best
way for users and sysops to find information on echoes that may be of
interest to them. I'm sure you've read the discussions there and my
comments.
So have others, so won't repeat them.  HOwever, if you're interested advise
in a netmail and I'll summarize.

TL> The March echolist, due out this weekend will incorporate the
TL> submissions from January through February, 2008


AS was said, thanks.  Understand security must trump just about everything
else, and from what I"ve seen from your comments a few days ago, you
were wise to make a backup of the data. SAw quite a few updates this
morning in the echolist echo, and some apparent duplicates of some of them
as well.

Regards,
           Richard
--- timEd 1.10.y2k+