-> ->>  RS> So why isn't Libby in jail?
-> ->> Why isn't Bill Clinton in jail?

 EC> He cannot answer that honestly.  He would have to go back
 EC> to all his Clinton defenses, and have them reexamined in
 EC> light of his opinions on the Libby conviction.  Such as his

-> How does that relate to my long standing "none of you have shown that
-> Clinton did lie under oath?" Which I did post as my response.

Since you are not "RS," your response is irrelevant to the point.  And
since what you call your "responses" are usually just silly
irrelevancies or madeup nonsense that can only be useful for humor or
fertilization, they are irrelevant to ANY point.  Everyone knows of your
long-standing denial of the facts, and no one cares.  It ranks right
down there with Lofaso's ramblings about the moon landing or Abe
Lincoln.

--- PCBoard (R) v15.3/M 10