(Excerpts from a message dated 11-18-99, Will Honea to Murray Lesser)
Hi Will--
WH>There are a couple of differences in the default processes with Warp
>4 - which you have complete control over - that would make a more
>visible difference with slower machines. One is the is SSMART or
>something like that which is part of the cut down nefinity software
>that comes with Warp 4. Warp 4 also runs more LAN processes (many
>not needed!) than Warp 3 did, especially if you don't have a LAN
>configured and use only TCP/IP for INET access. There are several of
>these trivialities that would probably show up pretty plainly on a
>constrained system. A careful study of some of the info about
>config.sys that has been compiled could allow you to trim the
>configuration and make a significant difference.
Thanks. But neither machine is connected to a LAN (sneaker-net
doesn't count!), and only I have dial-up modem connection. So I have
removed much of the LAN-only (and VDM tcp/ip) material from both
systems, which is why I can backup each of the two boot drives to a 100
MB Iomega Zip diskette. I figured out much of this for myself, and got
the rest from Dennis (and others) on this echo.
Anyway, thanks for reminding me that, in my post to Jack, I again
fell into the common trap of generalizing on my experience with my
specific configurations :-(.
Regards,
--Murray
___
* MR/2 2.25 #120 * Watching for speed bumps on the Information Highwy
--- Maximus/2 2.02
* Origin: OS/2 Shareware BBS, telnet://bbs.os2bbs.com (1:109/347)
|