> The case is legally and factually complex, making it harder for a jury to
> embrace a narrative that justifies a conviction.

What case are you refering to?

If you are refering to the NY case it has already concluded. Donald Trump was convicted.

> The indictment charges Trump with falsifying business records with intent to
> defraud,

I suppose the intent to defraud is a misdemeanor. Fraud itself is a felony.

> Did you see it? or miss it (due to your hatred and condition of TDS)

I have no TDS (clue, it's not a thing). I see Donald Trump for who he is.

> Bragg has alleged that there are multiple second crimes.
> We Are STILL Waiting to see. What These "Other Crimes" are Alleged to be.

Is this something new that Trump is being charged with, or is it the case where he was found guilty?

--- BBBS/Li6 v4.10 Toy-7