X-Received: by 10.55.48.148 with SMTP id w142mr8034010qkw.17.1511669640181;
        Sat, 25 Nov 2017 20:14:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.31.189.69 with SMTP id n66mr3075842vkf.6.1511669640015; Sat,
 25 Nov 2017 20:14:00 -0800 (PST)
Path:
eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.o
rg!news.mixmin.net!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!feeder.usenetexpress.co
m!feeder-in1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganew
s.com!g35no919902qtk.1!news-out.google.com!t48ni2134qtc.1!nntp.google.com!g35no
919901qtk.1!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2017 20:13:59 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: 
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com;
posting-host=47.138.172.229;
 posting-account=Qch2uwkAAACWd9WQYiJkDa8DbtwHM_iu
NNTP-Posting-Host: 47.138.172.229
References: 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: 
Subject: Re: Dell 780 Problem:
From: Mark Twain 
Injection-Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2017 04:14:00 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Lines: 30
Xref: feeder.eternal-september.org microsoft.public.windowsxp.general:134732

All this computer spec's etc. stuff I'm getting from you and 
reading and trying to keep up. Some of it I understand but
others I need to re-read ,........this is not my forte. 

this didn't open ,.. http://www.intel.com/Assets/PDF/prodbrief/320665.pdf

It sounds as if the 16GB of DDR2 is faster than 8GB of DDR3
but what is the best option for me? I already have 4GB of DDR3,.
could I have say 6GB? or do they have to be paired ? If so, then 
that would be a good compromise in increasing RAMM and also
taking into account the heat factor. What do you think? If 6 isn't
possible then stay with 4GB or add 4GB giving me eight? Which
would you choose?


http://www.crucial.com/ProductDisplay?urlRequestType=Base&catalogId=10151&categ
oryId=&productId=811501&urlLangId=-1&langId=-1&top_category=&parent_category_rn
=&storeId=10151

http://www.crucial.com/ProductDisplay?urlRequestType=Base&catalogId=10151&categ
oryId=&productId=11601&urlLangId=-1&langId=-1&top_category=&parent_category_rn=
&storeId=10151


From what you say my computer isn't even using 1GB of 2GB
and it has 4GB. So why would others want to add 16GB then? Is
it for gaming? What could possibly use that much RAMM ? I do
use and have allot of photo's etc.. so maybe it helps in that 
respect? I agree FF is a hog,.. maybe I should return to Explorer? 

Hmmmm so they did get it to work with 16GB using Crucial

Understood about testing new memory . 

--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.1