> Since 1990 abortions performed have decreased by ~ 2/3rds... Shocking, to me
> anyway.  Giving expectant mothers the choice and assistance they seem to go
> with having the baby.

Yeah, I posted something less than a week ago that used two different
sources that both said they were on a steady decline (but since the early
1980s).

> I say give women the support they need and if they choose to have an abortion
> have it early on...

Yes.

> If you guys on the left keep pushing unfeathered abortion any time... you
igh
> be sorry someday as someone might push for the rights of the unborn.

I am not on the left.  I am on the side of logic and math, and not the side
of emotion and feelings -- things the left normally uses.

Mathematically, as you found out on your own, there is no big mass killing of
babies.  Mathematically, there are also very few second and third trimester
abortions.  Should there probably be fewer?  Yes!

> I believe no one should kill a viable and healthy unborn baby... Just hours
r
> days before it could be born naturally.

As I have said in other posts, viability should be the point of
determination as to whether or not it should be done.  That is how Ohio
does it.  During Roe v. Wade, that is how our state used to do it.  That is
how the USA as a whole handled it until the AMA and others started sticking
their noses into it not long before the Civil War.


 * SLMR 2.1a * I didn't know fish HAD fingers !!!
--- SBBSecho 3.20-Linux