H>Even if you show that a country, like Canada, for instance, has increas
DH>its controls on guns, and that crime in the interim has worsened, it wo
DH>not prove the case against controlling guns, because, without those 
DH>controls, the crime rate may well be worse. 
One can similarly say, "...without those controls, the crime rate may well 
be less." Supposition is not factual.
The reason for stricter 
DH>controls in Canada in recent years is due, in large part, to the increa
DH>importation of guns from the United States. (ask the RCMP about this)
Are talking about legal or illegal importation?
DH> Rely more on common sense, as said before.
"Common sense" is merely the last resort of the person making a claim 
he cannot support.
 * Wave Rider 1.20 [NR] *
... UNREGISTERED EVALUATION COPY
--- GEcho 1.11+
---------------