>  MP> One thing O'Reilly did not mention is how Trump's administration could
>  MP> influence the outcome of said trials, but they do have the right to a
>  MP> fair trial.  I would also point out that I *think* they also share the
>  MP> right of a speedy trial, which they currently are *not* getting.

>  MP> So unless Trump decides to break the law, there will be no mass
>  MP> deporations.  If he decides to break the law, that would set a bad
>  MP> precident as the suspending of due process for these persons could open
>  MP> the door for similar things being done to citizens.

> Trump has mentioned something about hiring more Administrative Law Judges.
> Maybe that's the way to go. Build the wall, hire more judges, and don't let
> these people hang around until 2030.

That was sort of where I was going with "right of a speedy trial."  They
currently are not getting that.  If, for example, we as citizens were to
break the law and had to wait 5 or more years to find out our fates, that
would be considered a violation of our rights.


 * SLMR 2.1a * Let a fool hold his tongue and he will pass for a sage.
--- SBBSecho 3.20-Linux