-=> Alan Ianson wrote to jimmylogan <=-

 >> If a woman chooses to have an abortion no one has been killed.

 > Then our definition is NOT the same.

 AI> OK. I don't see any murder in abortion.

 AI> I see a woman making a decision for herself and her future.

Then we will never agree on this. I see the baby in the womb
as just as alive and a SEPERATE PERSON as the woman is.

 >> It is the womans life until it is born.

 > So in your mind a pregnant woman has two hearts? Two sets of lungs?
 > Etc.?

 AI> No.

Then how is it just her?

 > And that is something I guess we'll never agree on. I will firmly
 > defend the life inside the woman just as strongly as the life
 > outside the woman - and the woman's life too.

 AI> That's good to know.

 AI> The only difference betwwen our positions is that I beleive a woman has
 AI> the right to privacy and to make her own choice.

 AI> I may not agree with her choice or some parts of it, but it is still
 AI> her choice to make and she free to do what is best for her.

I believe in freedom of choice - I can choose to own a gun or not, but
I don't have the right to use that gun to murder someone else. Right now
abortion is legal in most places, and probably growing, but it doesn't
make it morally right.

 >> That's not rhetoric. That is what is happening today.

 > Okay - it's MOSTLY rhetoric, at least in my state.

 AI> It is not rhetoric, it is happening and will continue to happen unless
 AI> it is corrected.

Again, in Tennessee there are no reports of this. There are people claiming
it happens, because it goes against what they are pushing, but it's not
actually happening.

 AI> Abortion is health care for women. They need or want it as the case may
 AI> be.

 AI> Abortion on demand is not a thing.

Really? In some states you can get an abortion for any reason whatsoever.
How is that not abortion on demand?






... All wiyht.  Rho sritched mg kegtops awound?
--- MultiMail/Mac v0.52