"TIM RICHARDSON -> ED HULETT"  wrote in
news:10190$HOLYSMOKE{at}JamNNTPd:

 TR> On 05-06-09, ED HULETT said to ROSS SAUER:


 RS>>> So you are filled with hate for people who have the temerity to
 RS>>> disagree with you, eh?


 TR> You didn't indicate any such thing.

Wrong poster, dumb shit.

 RS>> Thanks for proving that you hate "those faggots," loser.


 EH>> Huh? Where did you come up with that? You might read the rule about
 TR> lying.


 TR> Nor did you express or imply `hatred' on any level.

Again...

 TR> But he just `so' wanted you to. He couldn't get you to on your
 TR> own....so he helped you. And from this point onward, he will always
 TR> ascribe that `to' you, his hateful friends will soon take it up, and
 TR> before you know it, it will become a cast iron fact in their fertile
 TR> little minds that you *hate* homsexuals! Bet on it.


 TR> I've been down that road with them, by the way, many years ago, and
 TR> know how that crap goes.


 TR> Sauer puts it out there with quote marks around it. Instead of saying
 TR> anything to Sauer for falsely attributing words to `you' that you did
 TR> not say or even imply, they immediately take up Sauer's false notion
 TR> and start hammering you with it.


 TR> Before long, they are quoting *you* in their posts to and from each
 TR> other, attributing Sauer's words to *you*.


 TR> After a month or so......nobody pays any attention to the real
 TR> `origin' of the words. It is taken as a given fact that *you* said
 TR> them!


 TR> Its an old trick of Sauer's. Get used to it.

Get it correct, for a change, dummy.

--- Xnews/5.04.25