-=> Ron L. wrote to jimmylogan <=-

 -=> jimmylogan wrote to Mike Powell <=-

 ji> I'm wondering about that myself... With the push for 'reproductive
 ji> rights' (what I call murder) and getting women to vote for that, I
 ji> wonder how that affected things?

 ji> Not sure we'll know... It affected me, in making me vote AGAINST it.

 RL> The hard facts are that women have always had 'reproductive rights'.
 RL> They say "no" and keep their legs closed.

Best form of birth control is a baby asperin held between the knees. :-)

But seriously, when you say that they bring up rape and incest. First,
these are a VERY very small percentage, but even in those cases I am
against abortion. There are no other crimes where we kill the offspring
of the criminal.

But even allowing for that and nothing else, which I'm not comfortable
with but is a step in the right direction, is not enough. What Clinton
called "safe and rare" is now "no one else's business, even up to the
point of birth."

 RL> But the Elitists always dress up their Narratives with opposite
 RL> sounding names.
 RL>  "Reproductive Rights" actually means "not having to take
 RL> responsibility for their decisions."

To me 'reproductive rights' means 'right to murder my unborn child.'
It's not 'reproductive' if you are stopping a pregnancy. 

Just like "planned parenthood" - really means "we kill the unplanned."

 RL> But this was always the plan.

 RL> I've noticed for a long time now that more adults seem to be more
 RL> child-like in their thinking.  One of the Elitists' plans was to create
 RL> a dependant-class that would always vote them into office.  Making
 RL> people child-like (unable to make rational decisions, needing someone
 RL> to absolve them of their bad decisions, do their thinking for them,
 RL> etc.) was being pushed out as early as the 1970's.

Agreed. We saw a bit of that with Hurricane Katrina...





... I don't have time to wait for instant gratification.
--- MultiMail/Mac v0.52