Moderator -> All wrote:
 M> Hello All!

 M> This message is primarily for Dan Ceppa And Jeff Binkley.

Why Jeff? Dan is the one making things up. Jeff hasn't once mentioned Ceppa's family.

 M> Dan Ceppa's family especially offspring are not topics for discussion by
 M> any stretch of the imagination unless Dan opens the door.

Dan *DID* open the door. Jeff never mentioned Dan's family.

 M> Jeffs viewpoints on religion are exactly that which he elaborates on and
 M> that which he does not, is not game for discussion.

How about the wild-eyed comments Ceppa has made about my choice of religion?

 M> The current back and forth, he said/he said/you are a liar debate is over.

When will we see a retraction from Ceppa?

 M> Neither party is required to answer questions put to them by the other.

You chose Ceppa as your co-mod and you have to address a moderator message
to him? Amazing.

Ed

-- 
"Wise politicians will be cautious about fettering the government with
restrictions that cannot be observed, because they know that every
break of the fundamental laws, though dictated by necessity, impairs
that sacred reverence which ought to be maintained in the breast of
rulers towards the constitution of a country."

--Alexander Hamilton, Federalist No. 25, 21 December 1787

Linux User #416016
Linux Machine #385030

--- Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090318)