From: Mike '/m' 


OK, SUSE is the Linux I've been playing with as my desktop OS as well.

I agree about the AS/400's for servers.  I used to car pool with a guy who
used to rave about the System 38's (I think that's the right number).

  /m

On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 11:32:03 -0500, "Robert Comer"
 wrote:

>> For servers, I prefer FreeBSD over Linux.  :-)
>
>For real servers I prefer AS/400's, but they're to expensive for home. 
>
>I'm not going to use SUSE on my server as a server OS, I'm going to use it
>as a desktop...
>
>>
>
>In some things it is for me, but not everything.
>
>- Bob Comer
>
>
>
>"Mike '/m'"  wrote in message
>news:fep321tqgr8j0m1ridigbo866e0o0pj3ro{at}4ax.com...
>>
>> For servers, I prefer FreeBSD over Linux.  :-)
>>
>> For perimeter protection, I prefer OpenBSD.
>>
>>  /m
>>
>> On Sat, 26 Feb 2005 21:37:27 -0500, "Robert Comer"
>> 
>> wrote:
>>
>>>Unfortunately I have to deal with it at work to stay compliant with
>>>division
>>>policy, but for home I already moved to OpenOffice 6 months ago. (it's
>>>cheaper...)
>>>
>>>I still use WinXP at home on a couple PC's, and they'll stay for now as
>>>well
>>>as on my work PC and laptop. I still like Windows better than any other
>>>desktop OS, and WinXP is the one that works the best for me right now.
>>>(and
>>>it's a good host for running my VPC and VMWare, and development stuff.)
>>>
>>>I just wiped one of my home servers (Win2003) about 5 hours ago in
>>>preparation for loading SUSE Linux.
>>>
>>>- Bob Comer
>>>
>>>"Mike '/m'"  wrote in message
>>>news:s19221hiopngjnmvo843b3p9rfmfcmj6p7{at}4ax.com...
>>>>> > That's just plain unacceptable to me.  :(
>>>>
>>>> I also.  One of the several reasons why I refuse to
"upgrade" to any
>>>> Microsoft
>>>> product that possesses the Product DeActivation feature.
>>>>
>>>>  /m
>>>>
>> [trim]
>

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5