Dan Ceppa -> Ed Hulett wrote:
 ->> On 04 May 09  10:57:01, Ed Hulett got back to Dan Ceppa
 ->> Re: A FUNDY PAIL FULL OF SHIT

 DC>>> It's you turn to prove I don't have your promissory note locked away
 DC>>> in a safe location.

 EH>>> Hahahahahahahahahahaha!!!!!

 EH>>> I couldn't care less what you say you have. It is incumbent on you to
 EH>>> prove you have one if you think you want to collect on it. I don't
 EH>>> have to prove anything.

 DC>> Your only problem is that you don't have a clue as to why you asking
 DC>> that and as to why I asked you prove it in the first place.

 EH>> Huh? I didn't ask you a thing. Don't blame me for your ignorance.

 DC> "It is incumbent on you to prove ..."

That is a statement and not a question. Your difficulty with the English
language is amazing.

 DC>> Joseph, the Con Man, Smith, of course.  You know, that fraud who
 DC>> made up that crap follow.

 EH>> That is your opinion and it is based on questionable stories.

 DC> Yeah. Joey's story is quite questionable.

The stories about the so-called court case are questionable. There are more
than one story and they contradict each other.

Ed

-- 
"Wise politicians will be cautious about fettering the government with
restrictions that cannot be observed, because they know that every
break of the fundamental laws, though dictated by necessity, impairs
that sacred reverence which ought to be maintained in the breast of
rulers towards the constitution of a country."

--Alexander Hamilton, Federalist No. 25, 21 December 1787

Linux User #416016
Linux Machine #385030

--- Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090318)