DC> DC> RS>It is *NOT* science.
DC>
DC> DC> JB> I made no such statement.  Please discontinue your lies.
DC>
DC> DC>You want it taught as an alternate theory to a scientific theory.

DC> JB> I did not state that either.  Please stop the lies.  I said I
DC> JB> wanted it  taught in school.  Period.  I said it brings up
DC> JB> issues that evolution  cannot answer and presents an alternative
DC> JB> viewpoint for those things.   That is exactly what I have said.
DC> JB> Many times.

DC>You really are a piece of work built from warped lumber.

Are you denying what I said above is true ?  If so, please post my exact
words.


DC> DC>Now, are you admitting that ID is not science?

DC> JB> I am not admitting one way or the other.  I have been very
DC>consistent

DC>One way of the other?  LOL!  What a fucjing coward you are!

Nope.  It is irrelevant to the discussion at hand.  It is you who is
hyperventilating over the topic.


DC>Evolutions brought up and you throw in ID as needing to be taught
DC>in school.  Now you are trying to say that that is "coincidental"?

Should be taught in school.  It is not "coincidental" in that the topics
were linked together in the thread.  I have stated many times that it is
an alternative viewpoint.  This the causality for discussion has been
established.


DC>Your intellectual dishonesty is truely amazing.

It is you who lies continuously, imagines what other people say and then
acts bewildered when they don't say what you thought they said.  That is
delusional behavior.



Jeff

CMPQwk 1.42-21 9999
Democrats --  The party of economic slavery ....

--- PCBoard (R) v15.3/M 10