EH>Why Jeff? Dan is the one making things up. Jeff hasn't once mentioned
EH>Ceppa's family.

EH> M> Dan Ceppa's family especially offspring are not topics for
EH> M> discussion by any stretch of the imagination unless Dan opens the
EH> M> door.

EH>Dan *DID* open the door. Jeff never mentioned Dan's family.

EH> M> Jeffs viewpoints on religion are exactly that which he elaborates
EH> M> on and that which he does not, is not game for discussion.

EH>How about the wild-eyed comments Ceppa has made about my choice of
EH>religion?

EH> M> The current back and forth, he said/he said/you are a liar debate
EH>is over.

EH>When will we see a retraction from Ceppa?

EH> M> Neither party is required to answer questions put to them by the
EH>other.

EH>You chose Ceppa as your co-mod and you have to address a moderator
EH>message to him? Amazing.

 JB> That's Ok.  I am done.  If Ross can't keep him under control I
 JB> won't  bother posting here any longer.  I provided numerous
 JB> examples of what  has been happening but it appears Ross wants to
 JB> moderate in away that  does not punish the guilty but admonishes
 JB> all participants.  His choice.   Not a big deal.  You'll be on your
 JB> own for now.  I'll keep an eye on  things and see if the moderation
 JB> style changes or not.  

Likewise, if Ceppa apologises to me for posting lies and defamations
about me, or if Cassell dismisses him as co-moderator, I will place
this echo on pass-through.

The ball is in the court of the moderators who are the source of the
problem. 

They have the solution, and it it is not bans and feed-cuts.

Cheers, Steve..

---