Jeff Binkley -> Ed Hulett wrote:


 M>>> This message is primarily for Dan Ceppa And Jeff Binkley.

 EH>> Why Jeff? Dan is the one making things up. Jeff hasn't once mentioned
 EH>> Ceppa's family.

 M>>> Dan Ceppa's family especially offspring are not topics for
 M>>> discussion by any stretch of the imagination unless Dan opens the
 M>>> door.

 EH>> Dan *DID* open the door. Jeff never mentioned Dan's family.

 M>>> Jeffs viewpoints on religion are exactly that which he elaborates
 M>>> on and that which he does not, is not game for discussion.

 EH>> How about the wild-eyed comments Ceppa has made about my choice of
 EH>> religion?

 M>>> The current back and forth, he said/he said/you are a liar debate
 EH>> is over.

 EH>> When will we see a retraction from Ceppa?

 M>>> Neither party is required to answer questions put to them by the
 EH>> other.

 EH>> You chose Ceppa as your co-mod and you have to address a moderator
 EH>> message to him? Amazing.

 JB> That's Ok.  I am done.  If Ross can't keep him under control I won't
 JB> bother posting here any longer.  I provided numerous examples of what
 JB> has been happening but it appears Ross wants to moderate in away that
 JB> does not punish the guilty but admonishes all participants.  His choice.
 JB> Not a big deal.  You'll be on your own for now.  I'll keep an eye on
 JB> things and see if the moderation style changes or not.

I don't get it. Why is Ross so protective of Ceppa?

Soon Ceppa and Sauer will have this echo all their own.

Ed

-- 
"The ultimate result of shielding men from the effects of folly is
to fill the world with fools." --Herbert Spencer

"The principle of spending money to be paid by posterity, under
the name of funding, is but swindling futurity on a large scale."
 --Thomas Jefferson

Linux User# 416016
Linux Machine# 379711

--- Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090105)