->  -> You're the one that can't prove that negative, Jeff...

Which is belief in a negative assertion! :-) Hey, neat-o!


  It's not my fault 
->  -> that logic is completely alien to you.
-> 
->  JO> Nor mine that mathematics is foreign to you.
->  
-> John, are you fucking aware that math puposely has man made defined 
-> absolutes and rules?
Are you aware that Euclid Geometry has undergone changes/improvements?
That math has undergone a revolution in the past decade?
That is you Google "Proving a negative", has thousands of things to say
about it...

  There are givens that are not part of the 
-> scientific method.
The Copenhagen methodology, Hiesenberg, Feynman, Wheeler...et cetera
Are redefining almost everything, once 'known'...  

The logical law of non-contradiction is in itself a negative. 
Scientific method refers to bodies of techniques for investigating
phenomena, acquiring new knowledge, or correcting and integrating previous
knowledge. ...
I'm right on top of that, as is my church.

 "as
-> far as the laws of mathematics refer to reality, they are not certain;
and as
-> far as they are certain, they do not refer to reality."[6]

I'm quite aware of the quotes. 
-> 
-> Now, go back to sleep. 

Man, you are SO transparent..
--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr5