-> On 01 May 09  09:45:53, Ed Hulett got back to Dan Ceppa 
-> Re: "Good Christians"

 DC>> Do you any idea as to what you wrote and how wrong your analysis is?
 
 EH>> The wording of the CNN blog posting made it sound like the sampling
 EH>> was larger than it was. The sampling was so small it was pointless to
 EH>> even take the poll.

And, your expertise on polling is what, exactly?  

 DC> Demonstrate that the sample size was too small for the conclusions
 DC> it drew.

 EH> The poll sample was too small for the conclusion the article made. It

That's your opinion.  Where's your math degree for statistical analysis>  

 EH>> Actually it shows it was a very subjective sampling and the results
 EH>> are skewed to fit you and Sauer's agenda.
 
 DC> That's right, CNN is under Ross' control and fakes polls at his behest!

 EH> Good grief. I said no such thing. I said the article fits his agenda.
 EH> Do try to keep from lying. 

You stated it was skewed to "fit you[sic] and Sauer's agenda[sic]" .

 DC>> A rough guess:  Groups with numbers under about 15% in the total
 DC>> population were not individualy analyzed.  Your cult isn't large
 DC>> enough to have been cited separately.
 
 EH>> And here we have your bigotry on display yet again.

Problem is, Ed, that your group was too small in the sample to draw 
any conclusons.  Get over it!  

 
 DC> It's not my fault you joined a cult that wears magical underwear.

 EH> Again, your bigotry is on display for all to see. Your continued
 EH> obsession with my underwear is getting out of hand. Do try to curb

You still haven't figured it out yet, have you Ed?  Your magical Attends 
are nothing but a totem used by your handlers to secure assert mind contol 
over you.  



... To YOU I'm an atheist; to God, I'm the Loyal Opposition.
--- OMX/Blue Wave/DOS v2.30