RL>  AT> You're probably right. The good thing about this is that they have
 RL>  AT> those 1600 voters identified, so it should be a simple process to
 RL>  AT> disqualify them later, if that's the route they've got to take.
 RL> 
 RL> The problem is the timing.  By the time it goes through the courts, the
 RL> votes would have been counted and certified, making disqualifying them
 RL> irrelevant.

If the votes are cast, and if they impact the electoral votes, couldn't the corresponding electoral vote be disqualified also?

 RL> The same here in Michigan.  Our tyrant passed a "law" (no Congress
 RL> didn't vote on it) making it "illegal" to contest the election.  Blatent
 RL> violation of the Constitution.  But they are banking on the courts not
 RL> doing anything until after the election is over and done, allowing their
 RL> cheating to stand.

Is your state's GOP doing anything about the unfair law? Is there anyone in your state's GOP who is worth contacting about it?

 RL>  AT> We didn't do enough to fight it in 2020.
 RL> 
 RL> We did.  We just got stonewalled at every step.  "Most secure election in
 RL> history.  So you are just a conspiracy theorist."  Charging the electors
 RL> and putting them in jail.  Not prosecuting people who certainly
 RL> committed election crimes, on video.  Not allowing inspection of the
 RL> voting machines until LONG after the election was certified (and it
 RL> showed that the voting machine software switched voted - always in favor
 RL> of the Elitists).  And the courts did nothing.

But we were still somewhat unprepared for the election in 2020. We still have illegal immigrants on voter rolls, deceased voters, voters who moved out of the county, etc. All that stuff should have been cleaned up a long time ago but it's still a mess.

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A49 2023/04/30 (Windows/64)