Path:
eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.o
rg!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "J. P. Gilliver (John)" 
Newsgroups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Subject: Re: Running XP on a 64bit processor computer
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2017 02:27:02 +0000
Organization: 255 software
Lines: 31
Message-ID: 
References: 
 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=us-ascii;format=flowed
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org;
posting-host="0fd5add83b53b38b5a747c92029d8602";
 logging-data="21877"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
posting-account="U2FsdGVkX187Pw+yQt/ATX1O+BDbFqIq"
User-Agent: Turnpike/6.07-M ()
Cancel-Lock: sha1:hOc9eQVD5gTF95bMfbfLL9BVimM=
Xref: feeder.eternal-september.org microsoft.public.windowsxp.general:134648

In message , MikeS  writes:
>On 20/11/2017 21:59, james@nospam.com wrote:
>> I have a computer which originally came witt Vista. It's a 64bit
>> machine. I got it with XP Pro SP3 installed. I know that XP is 32bit.
>> I'm a little puzzled about this. Can XP (or any 32bit OS) run on a
>> computer that has a 64bit processor?
>>  (I know you cant do it the other way. You cant run a 64 bit OS on a 
>>32
>> bit machine).
>>  Does running a 32 bit OS on a 64bit machine work any better or worse
>> than it does using an actual 32 bit computer?
>>
>Yes provided you mean an x64 bit processor which is an extension of the 
>32 bit architecture.
>The advantage of using a 64 bit OS version (such as the final version 
>of  Win XP - Pro 64 bit) was mainly a larger address space allowing > 4 
>GB RAM.
>
You didn't answer the last part of James's question - "Does running a 32 
bit OS on a 64bit machine work any better or worse than it does using an 
actual 32 bit computer?"

(FWIW, I suspect it'll run about the same, other than that the 64bit 
machine is probably faster and may have more cores - but those are not 
specific to it's 64bitness. There _may_ be a few cases where the 
firmware in the processor makes a few operations work better, but if 
any, I suspect this is an insignificant proportion of the time.)
-- 
J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/<1985 MB++G()AL-IS-Ch++(p)Ar@T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf

All's well that ends.
--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.1