From: sresnick@slip.net
Newsgroups: rec.games.chess.analysis
Subject: Hinkle Counter-Gambit
Organization: Deja News - The Leader in Internet Discussion
ftn.hub.org!hub.org!news.gv.tsc.tdk.com!WCG!dca1-hub1.news.digex.net!digex!ais
.net!logbridge.uoregon.edu!nntp2.dejanews.com!nnrp2.dejanews.com!not-for-mail
A few weeks back, there was some discussion of:
>1. d4  Nf6, 2. g4
>Black has no clear, concrete line that takes the
>initiative out of White's hands
When surprised in a blitz game with this gambit for the first time, my friend
Wayne Hinkle immediately responded with 2. ... Nxg4 3. e4 Nxf2?!. I explored
this counter-gambit against my computer (Chess321), forcing the first 3 
oves,
then playing White in a 60 moves/30 minutes game. I'd appreciate any comments
on the game, the counter-gambit, & best response to it.
WHITE: Me
BLACK: Chess321
1.  d4     Nf6
2.  g4?!   Nxg4
3.  e4     Nxf2?!
4.  Kxf2   e5
5.  Nf3    ed
6.  Bg2    Bc5
7.  Qd3    Nc6
8.  a3     0-0
9.  Bg5    Qe8
10. Nd2    d6
11. Rhf1   Ne5
12. Nxe5   de
13. Kg1    h6
14. Bh4    Bg4
15. Kh1    a6
16. Qg3    h5
17. h3     Be2
18. Bf6    g6
19. Rf5    Qb5
20. Bf3    Bxf3
21. Nxf3   Qb6
22. Qg5    Qxb2
(or 22. ... Kh7, 23. Rg1! forces mate, no?)
23. Qh6 and mates after a couple meaningless checks.
Stuart
sresnick@slip.net
http://www.slip.net/~sresnick/mypage.shtml
-----== Posted via Deja News, The Leader in Internet Discussion ==-----
http://www.dejanews.com/   Now offering spam-free web-based newsreading
---
---------------