On Fri, 23 Sep 2005 02:45:00 -0700, > wrote:

 TR> On 09-22-05, CINDY HAGLUND said to ED HULETT:


 EH>> This isn't a debate.


 TR> This is too rich. First, they are all complaining about nobody wanting to
 TR> "debate" them.

They have no idea what debate is.

 CH>>   I've always thought if you want debate, start one, otherwise shut
 TR> up
 CH>> about it already. IOW: Instead of incessantly complaining about 'the
 TR> lack
 CH>> of it'. DO IT.


 TR> Then they whine because nobody wants to engage in *their* type of debate
 TR> (which means becoming a target for all their hate mail).

It is their fault that this echo is almost dead.

 CH>> It's that simple, Ed.


 EH>> There is no one here worth debating. Not one of you are intelligent
 EH>> enough to know what debate is.


 CH>> That isn't true Ed. The fact of the matter is debating religion is
 CH>> basically an exercise in futility. You know this. We all do.


 TR> Then......Haglund lets the cat out of the bag and `confirms' that their
 TR> purpose isn't "debate" at all, since "debating
religion is basically an
 TR> exercise in fulility".

You got it. They have no intention to debate.

 CH>> If you want to do it for 'brain exercise' fine, but some folks would
 CH>> rather exercise their brains with other more useful topics.


 TR> And then turns around and denounces the very idea of "debating" the
 TR> subject in
 TR> the first place, thereby cutting the legs out from under Ceppa's
 TR> expressed
 TR> desire to "debate" religion in the first place!

I told you they weren't that smart.

 TR> They're all a bunch of mind-warped idiots in here.....and Haglund is
 TR> their
 TR> queen!

They all deserve each other.

Ed

-- 
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/

--- Opera M2/8.50 (Linux, build 1358)