In a message to Wayne Sarosi Rob Dennis wrote:
> RD>> I just wish some company's would bother to take into account
> RD>> `self-taught' skills instead of looking only as far as a diploma
> RD>> or certificate.
WS> They don't nor do they care. I been there and done that.
RD> Nope they don't.
Wait a minute. Some companies still require the sheepskin regardless if
you have experience. I know. I have been through that.
> RD>> Now I'm wondering if building the LPDA
> RD>> is going to net me the same result.
> WS> Maybe not but it's worth the effort.
RD> Just for the fun of doing it so it works on 2m,6m and 70cm SSB.
RD> The fun is in the building,the challenge is that math to cover
RD> those three bands on their SSB calling frequencies.
RD> WIth one LPDA on 2m,6m,70cm I can cut
RD> back to one SSB antenna and a pair of 6
RD> element dual-band beams for FM work.
It's ideal and if you can put it on an AZ-EL rotor you can do 6m-70cm
in all modes with great gain.
RD> My computer used to blow the brains out of the 6m and HF
RD> rigs,but now I'm running a 486-DX-4/133 and it doesn't even blip them.
RD> The 386/40 shredded the 6m rig with all
RD> kinds of birdies no matter how much
RD> choking I did to the lines on the back.
RD> And when the screen-saver kicked in the
RD> HF radio had a S-30 signal from 1600
RD> all the way up to 29.999.
RD> It so nice to be able to use packet for the first time now for
RD> spotting band openings on 6m or 2m. while talking on HF.
I'm happy you found the problem. You have been stuck with that
since I've seen you on FIDO. I remember you sending me stuff on
your problem and now you can kick it out the door.
-WS
---
---------------
* Origin: Editor HTL, Moderator HAM_TECH (Quick 1:374/73.2)
|