MP> > I understand your point, but it's guilt by association. Kamala Harris is
 MP> > associated with someone who is a member of a political group that public
 MP> > slandered Trump.
 MP> 
 MP> The group didn't slander Trump.  They stated their "wish list" for a
 MP> future USA, a list that ironically some folks in this echo have
 MP> expressed a liking for, but now it is "slander."

The fake manifesto has been intentionally used by the media to deceptively "warn" voters of what happens if Trump wins. Anyone associated with the group that makes that effort is guilty by association.

 MP> As for the rest of it, as an admitted Trump supporter in this echo, if
 MP> you say something completely off the wall, it is Trump's fault?  If

Me and Trump are not members of a foundation, but if we were, then anything I say could be used against Trump.

 MP> another Trump supporter makes an off the wall claim in this echo, are
 MP> you guilty by association, too?

Most of us have been using Mystic BBSs to complain about Biden/Harris on Fidonet since day 1 of his administration. Clearly g00r00 never joins the discussion in this echo, but if he were to donate $7 million dollars to Trump's campaign, he would still be guilty by association (of trashing Biden/Harris) because he's inadvertently the ring-leader of all this talk.

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A49 2023/04/30 (Windows/64)