Hello Bob!

21 Apr 08 14:10, you wrote to me:

 RC>> and in return for that paycheck, he is teaching. My father
 RC>> worked for the US Govt, in return for his paycheck, he
 RC>> performed the job they paid him to do.

 BK>  A: He is still living off the taxpayers. That was your reference
 BK>  above.

No you dolt, he is performing a service in return for his paycheck..

Your buddy Sauer does what exactly?

Wait, you want to say all public sector employees are welfare leeches?

 BK>  B: Ever wonder how he jumps from private sector failure to
 BK>  public payroll so easily?

I wonder about nothing, in contrast to Sauer, Stan contributes or do you
have something against teachers?

 BK>  C: Again, every supposed success he has seems to come through
 BK>  the government.

How do you explain Sauers failures?

 BK>  D: The behavior he has exhibited here suggests he is likely
 BK>  doing a lot of harm in that school.

Want to wonder what your behavior suggests?

 RC>> Not a very good comparison Bob, all Sauer has to do is walk
 RC>> out to his mailbox and get his check.

 RC>> BIG BIG difference.

 BK>  But it's not what you said. And it does indicate Hardegree's
 BK>  failure in the private sector.

Which I wasnt talking about Stan, that was a diversion on your part, Sauer
has demostrated failure in both public and private sector, something you
seem to ignore.

Are you going to classify my own father as a failure, someone whom spent
near 40 years working for the National Security Agency?

 RC>> Oh really, remember you served in the military too, what
 RC>> has Stan had given to him?

 BK>  Aside from growing up on a govt paycheck, raising his family
 BK>  mostly on a govt paycheck, there is his degree. He said the army
 BK>  paid for his master's degree. He didn't specify on his
 BK>  Bachelors, but I do suspect.

You would have rejected this if you had stayed in longer?

Wait, you are a Democrat, you hate the military, all of you do.

 RC>> More to the point, Stan is contributing, what does Sauer

 BK>  Hardegree contributes more to poisoning the American culture
 BK>  than anything else. Like I said, if he behaves there like he
 BK>  behaves here, he should not be allowed near a student. And
 BK>  people do tend to follow a pattern.

and lets us hear you extoll your virtues?

 RC>> contribute, since you are his self-appointed knight in
 RC>> shining armour?

 BK>  That is a major pile of bullshit from you. I do not defend Ross,
 BK>  I just jump all over those of you on the right who spout off so
 BK>  ignorantly, or malevolently.

While you did chide Sauer over his fake jew remarks, you refuse to hold him
responsible for his own negative contributions to debate. You refuse to
note the times in which people do try to engage him in honest debate and do
not imbibe in any negativity, only to have him inject poison rhetoric in
his responses. Yes I know he receives negative rhetoric alot, but there
still are exceptions to this and he ends up spoiling the scene.


==
Ross
Fidonet Feeds Or Fidonet In Your Newsreader: http://www.easternstar.info
E-mail: ross(at)cassell(dot)us | Blogs/Other Places: http://links.cassell.us
... A Independent: A Democrat who is in denial.
--- GoldED+/W32 1.1.5-30413