On 12-28-05, ROSS SAUER said to TIM RICHARDSON:

TR>EH> WC> Precisely the same thing can be said about paranoid
TR>EH> WC> schizophrenics.


TR>EH>Actually, it cannot.


TR>RS>As to paranoid schizophrenia, someone I know has it, bad.
TR>RS>She is totally convinced God speaks to her, telling her that she
TR>RS>is the rightful ruler of the world.


TR>RS>Prove she is wrong!


TR>You'd have to first prove she exists at all. I doubt you could.


RS>Lame attempt at a diversion. Again.


No "diversion". *You* claim to know someone who has schizophrenia. Further,
*you* claim its a female.


*You* once also claimed to have worked on A-10 Warthogs in the U.S. Air Force.


*You* also once claimed to have found a `glowing' meteor in one of the Great
Lakes.


*You* also once claimed to have a friend who was a professor of geology who
told you there were `no sand dunes in Afghanistan.


But your `claims' have pretty well all turned out to be lies, distortions,
exaggerations, if not "a vivid dream".


Naturally, with you having a track record like that.........proof that you
know anyone who is paranoid schizophrenic, that is also a female, and that she
`hears' God speak to her, is pretty well in absolute demand.


RS>Then again, you never could answer honestly.


I see nothing dishonest in making that requirement of *you*. Its a necessity.
After all.........how do we know *you* are being honest?


You could make the claim that you worked on Aa-10 Warthogs in the U.S. Air
Force.........but without a photo of you doing so, nobody would believe you.


You could also claim that there's a TV antenna on the roof of the building you
live in, but in an age of cable TV hookups, I doubt anyone would believe you.
(I know I wouldn't)


---
*Durango b301 #PE* Ex parte - By only one party to a dispute in the absence
of the other