Quoting: Robert Jung about ARJ/2 to Nicky Morrow.
 > I think JAR can compete (and beat!) RAR, but _only_ if R. Jung make
 > JAR/2. Othervice JAR has almost no chances.
 
 NM> Agree.  RAR/2 is really nice.  PK has PKZIP/2 in beta.  LZH/2 has been
 NM> available for a considerable period of time as have other archivers. 
 NM> For rj to continue to ignor the OS/2 platform is to ignor the fact
 NM> that OS/2 is a popular platform (and is growing in popularity) in the
 NM> market that he sells in.
 RJ> us (big bucks). :)  We took the step  forward with JAR because the
 RJ> corporate market (our market) is migrating to  Windows, Windows 95 and
 RJ> Windows NT.  JAR has required a lot of work by our  company.  It was
 RJ> more than I originally estimated, but we have a much finer  product
 RJ> than I expected.  RAR is a fine product, but for backup purposes it 
But are there any plans at all to consider an os/2 version?  I love Arj,
simply due to its vast capabilities via commandline parameters... but I am
increasingly doing more and more things in os/2 native instead of in dos..
which is making it more and more of a nuisance to have to spawn a dos
session for handling of archives...  I would like to check out Jar and see
what it has to offer, but see no point in it if it doesn't support the
platform that I need it for...
 
-- "Rev P. Spence" 
| Ask not why we sing this song,
|  'Cause Everything you think you know is wrong
| Agent of Chaos - Team OS/2
... But, Your Honor, the light had dopplered to green.
--- Renegade v97-021a dos
---------------