BF>BF>> ... After all, this is why the ZCs have a standing invitation to
BF>BF>>     take part of the FTSC work.
 
BF>WD> Really ??
 
BF> Yes, really. Give or take some unfortunate mishaps. 8-)
 
Let's not re-write history:
 
1) First of all, I really had to argue a lot like around 10 years ago to become
linked on the argumentation "How can you expect cooperation from ZCs if they
are not linked and involved?". It was not automatic.
 
2) The contributions from ZC1 and ZC2 in said echo are voluntarily and
deliberatly scrapped by Michiel van der Vlist who is incompetent at leaving his
personal grudges at the entrance door of something which should be technical.
 
If the FTSC really wants ZCs to assist in reaching the FTSC mission statement,
then a few of its members badly need to re-evaluate what they're doing there
and consider not avoiding the issue of one of its members going over the cliff.
 
 \%/@rd

--- D'Bridge 3.99 SR33