-> On 04-23-08, JOHNJWILSON said to TIM RICHARDSON:
-> 
-> 
-> -> ->  TR> Expulsions also come because some people don't like to see
-> -> ->  TR> their own words appear as taglines.
-> 
-> 
-> -> JJ>Some people don't like the idea of flaming via context-less
taglines.
-> -> JJ>Even when truthful, it's not fair.
-> 
-> 
-> -> Tough shit!
-> 
-> 
-> ->If I've learned anything in my 67 years of existance, its that
-> ->life isn't guaranteed to be `fair'; only continuous from the day
you're
-> ->born to the day you die.
-> 
-> 
-> JJ>You should have learned that the attempt to be so is a pretty good
idea...
-> 
-> 
-> You don't understand;;;;;I don't give a damn about any `attempt to be
so'
-> period!

An interesting stance. 
-> 
-> 
-> I'm nice to those I `choose' to be nice to, and I'm nasty to anyone I
choose
-> to be nasty to.

OK...what determines this? Politcal stance? Or the 'cut of his jib'? Or a
general accumulative dislike over the years? :-)

-> 
-> 
-> If nobody likes it.........tough!

:-)

-> 
-> 
-> Nobody pays my rent or my bills but me. *You* don't buy the food that
goes on
-> my table, and neither does that half-wit, Klahn.

True, but relevant?
-> 
-> 
-> *You* don't get to define who I should be nice to, when or where.

Stout independence. Good!

This leads to a satisfactory life for you. Who would quarrel with that? Or
"define" for you a different path? Not I. 'Different strokes...'
Cheers, from the Very Different. :-)
  
oh. There's more:
> 
-> 
-> You chose to butt your stupid-assed nose into something that you
obviously
-> were `not' in on at the beginning, as did that fat pig, Klahn.

Whatever.
-> 
-> 
-> When you butt into it and get burned.....you have nobody to blame but
-> yourself.

I seldom blame myself for opinions I hold...

(Burned?)

-> 
-> 
-> I don't need any approval from you for anything I do or say. And the
same
-> goes for Klahn.

He's a piece of dog shit.

Opinion noted.

-> 
-> 
-> Klahn chose to take up for him, defending his obvious lies. Klahn's a
piece
-> of dog shit in his own right, so its not surprising that he gyrated
right to
-> Sauer. They were made for each other.

Yawn. If it wern't for Sauer, what would many in here talk about?

 
-> 
-> Klahn recently railed at a bunch of people in here over them not
immediately
-> slamming Witt for the things he said to Klahn...

Witt is an avowed shit disturber...a 'Button pusher"...not to be taken
seriously...

(Remind you of anyone?)


 (as if we were supposed to drop
-> everything and come to Klahn's defense, after he's been in here for a
year or
-> more heaping insults and slams on all of us).
-> 
-> 
-> Yet.........he takes up for a proven liar of the likes of Sauer, for no
other
-> reason than to rail at those he (Klahn) dislikes. The funny thing
is....he
-> sees no obvious double standard in that!
-> 
-> 
-> As for you..........I have to wonder that some of the things you've been
-> demanding that *I* do to `just get along'......you have *never* aimed at
-> Sauer or Klahn when they toss insults around. Nor, for that matter, in
all
-> the time Sauer was loudly insulting me, and slamming my deceased wife,
you
-> never said a word in rebuke to him.

So...YOU want to define MY relationships with others...not a chance.:-)

Still more:

 
-> 
-> It may come as news to you (and Klahn also), but you are `not' the one
who
-> sets standards for me on any level. You don't like what I say.....don't
read
-> me, Just hit the (N)ext key.

I wouldn't miss your posts for the world!

(Nor care over much that you don't appreciate my noble efforts at comity.)
Again, Cheers!
--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr5