I wonder, whenever I hear about this stuff from Texas, if Texan know that many
folk in the other 49 *laugh* at them, often?  Of *course* there are no
*homosexuals* (or, other peole actually enjoying sex that isn't marriage
sanctioned church approved practice in Texas.  Oh no, not in *Texas.* :~)).
They all emigrated to California, of course.  Well, this is the state, when
noticing that the number of fatalities on the highway did not exceed the number
of fatatlities due to "gun inviolved inicidents" raised the speed limit on
allmthe highways.  Gotta love those guys ... L. 
>the Supreme Court struck down Texas' sodomy laws (along with the laws in a
>few other states) and while there are probably a lot of opinions on that,
>what I thought was hillarious was the argument Texas used to support the
>laws...
>
>from an AP story
>(http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20030626/ap_on_go_su_co/s
>cotus_sodomy_11)
>
>Texas defended its sodomy law as in keeping with the state's interest in
>protecting marriage and child-rearing. Homosexual sodomy, the state argued
>in legal papers, "has nothing to do with marriage or conception or
>parenthood and it is not on a par with these sacred choices."
>
>umm... just how many kids are married couples creating while exercising
>their sacred choice to have anal sex?
>I'm betting that's a really small voting demographic...
>

--- Rachel's Little NET2FIDO Gate v 0.9.9.8 Alpha