NOTE TO ALL:  Do NOT reply to this message, except by private netmail or 
e-mail.  This thread is OFF-TOPIC.
Tuesday September 03 1996 03:49, Daniel Martin wrote to Bill Cheek:
 BC>> I know.  But there are two difficulties there.  One was that your reply
 BC>> was directed to one who does not argue very well before dropping off
 BC>> into the emotional side of things..
 DM> Oh pulleeeze. Bill, please refrain from calling me emotional.I don't
 DM> get emotional, I  just give it with both barrels when warranted.
You don't understand.  You will NOT "give it with both barrels" on this echo 
because it will never be warranted.  You may challenge an issue, if 
necessary; you may not challenge the writer.  And I make that plain on no 
uncertain terms.
You must understand and comply; you do not have a choice.
 DM> Hell, I even said you were correct on this issue. Oh well, if you
 DM> want to flame me , go ahead, be my guest,just watch out fo the
 DM> moderator, he comes down pretty hard on those that cast the first
 DM> stone, or so I've heard.
You have "cast many stones" on this echo over the last two years.  See to it 
that you remain ON-TOPIC and refrain from any emotional diatribe, satire, 
invective, innuendo, or other statements that would tend to arouse ire in 
others.  If you can do that, you are welcome to participate here.
If you can't do that, then you are not welcome.  Please understand that I 
have the last word on this.  Do not reply (except by netmail, if necessary).  
Just assimilate it, and act accordingly so that I will not have to.
There will be no further warnings to you in public or in private.  You know 
the score.  A public reply like yours above is absolutely out of the 
question. Don't do it again.
Thank you.
Bill Cheek
MODERATOR - ScanRadio
--- Hertzian Mail+
---------------