"Ron"  wrote in message news:T_jsv.180499$Fd3.111956@fx26.iad...
>
>On 6/30/2014 3:16 PM, Buffalo wrote:
>> "Ron"  wrote in message news:AO4sv.54036$nc6.23335@fx27.iad...
>>>
>>> On 6/29/2014 11:16 PM, Ron wrote:
>>>> On 6/29/2014 9:17 PM, Buffalo wrote:
>>>>> wrote in message news:o7duq9l5feftc0qre3a3s53qce7us1mkok@4ax.com...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sat, 28 Jun 2014 14:31:47 -0400, Ron  wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 6/28/2014 2:03 PM, FredW wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Sat, 28 Jun 2014 13:49:29 -0400, Ron  wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 6/28/2014 9:38 AM, FredW wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 27 Jun 2014 15:03:31 -0700, charliec@email.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 27 Jun 2014 22:09:01 +0200, FredW
>>>>>>>>>>>>  wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 27 Jun 2014 11:17:44 -0700, charliec@email.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 27 Jun 2014 13:24:58 +0200, FredW
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3. As you have a paid version, you are well advised to use
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MBAM
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> real-time as an addition to Norton.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've always seen comments that it is not advisable to run 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> more
>>>>>>>>>>>>> then one
>>>>>>>>>>>>> AV product at a time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> MBAM is not an AV product, it is anti-malware additional to
>>>>>>>>>>>> anti-virus.
>>>>>>>>>>>> See the website:
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.malwarebytes.org/antimalware/
>>>>>>>>>>>> "Detects and eliminates malware your antivirus will miss."
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I have MBAM running real-time beside my AV and some other
>>>>>>>>>>>> security
>>>>>>>>>>>> products.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "I have MBAM running real-time beside my AV and some other 
>>>>>>>>> security
>>>>>>>>> products."
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> So why do you use an antivirus program? You don't trust MBAM?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Please learn to read.
>>>>>>>> I answered a question of OP.
>>>>>>>> Mbam is NOT an AV program.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Have a nice day.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Did I ask you if you answered a question of the OP?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Norton isn't an anti-malware program. The OP already said he used
>>>>>>> MBAM
>>>>>>> to remove Op Pro. You are just busting his balls for no reason and
>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>> know it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "And you used Mbam to remove the intruder and not NAV? Why? Did
>>>>>>> you not
>>>>>>> trust NAV?"
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ron, to get back on topic!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am giving "Protection" in Mbam v1.75 a try - I just turned it on,
>>>>>> and will see
>>>>>> how it works with NAV (current paid version).  I am running them on
>>>>>> Win7 64bit.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> A question, in Mbam on the Protection Tab, which items on there do 
>>>>>> you
>>>>>> recommend
>>>>>> turning on.  I have some checked, but not all.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Any other recommendations for running it?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>> charliec
>>>>>
>>>>> Why are you asking Ron?  He doesn't seem to know anything about the pd
>>>>> version (or any version) of MBAM.
>>>>> I use the pd version of MBAM and have everything checked under the
>>>>> Protection tab. I run it in real time with Avast.
>>>>
>>>> And I'm sure you know more about MBAM than Dustin and David Cook, 
>>>> right?
>> (Lipman)
>>
>> Of course not.
>>
>>
>>> BTW, I've helped you out in the past over in alt.privacy.spyware, so I
>>> don't why you have an attitude towards me.

Don't remember that , but thanks.
Again, reread all your post under this topic and see if you can possibly see 
where I got the perception where YOU were the one with the attitude.
Remember this one "So why do you use an antivirus program? You don't trust 
MBAM?"   I guess I just imagined the attitude you did not have..  :)

>>>
>>>
>>
>> When I say malware, I am mainly talking about spyware and adware.
>
>Malicious software. All viruses are malware, not all malware are viruses. 
>I've had antivirus programs detect trojans before, but it wouldn't remove 
>them. MBAM and/or Emsisoft did remove them.

Wow!  Actually Dustin explains about malware, viruses, etc very well. Read 
his stuff.
Running MBAM in real time may have prevented it from ever installing, don't 
you think? Then again, perhaps it would have missed it also.

>>
>> You didn't seem to know that MBAM was not an antivirus program and that
>> Norton didn't offer protection against malware.
>
>I do know the difference. Why do you bother using the paid version of MBAM? 
>Why not just rely on Avast?

Now that is a stupid question.

>>
>> ("Norton isn't an anti-malware program")\
>
>Again, all viruses are malware, not all malware are viruses. You have to 
>have specialty tools like MBAM to remove malware that your AV won't.

Then why should I run MBAM along with my anti-virus program? That is the 
question you asked me just a couple of lines above.


>>
>> As for attitude towards FredW:
>> ("You are just busting his balls for no reason and you
>> know it.")
>> (" So why do you use an antivirus program? You don't trust MBAM?")
>
>Did you miss Fred's comment to charlie asking "don't you trust NAV?"?

No, I read it.

>>
>> And towards me:
>> ("And I'm sure you know more about MBAM than Dustin and David Cook,
>> right?")

I replied "Of course not"

>
>In response to----->> Why are you asking Ron?  He doesn't seem to know 
>anything about the pd version (or any version) of MBAM.
>
>> I was just saying that because of the above statements you made, you
>> appear to have little understanding of what  MBAM can detect, let alone
>> how to use its settings.
>
>I use MBAM as a *tool*. I've never had a problem with the updates until 2.0 
>so I never messed with the settings...no need to.

That tells me a lot.

>
>And if you wanna really know what MBAM can do read Dustin's long post.
>
>Very helpful info.

I did read it and I actually understood it. Very good. Your posts and 
explanations were not, and I read them at least twice.

-- 
Buffalo

--- NewsGate v1.0 gamma 2