Hello Eric!

16 Sep 2015 00:13, Eric Renfro wrote to Benny Pedersen:

 ER> Nice!

+1

 ER> I didn't know about rntrack. Seems to be the open-source alternative 
 ER> to O/T-Track, eh? I like it! I'll use it gladly if it works! Personally I 
 ER> think every node in an FTN network should run something like this, have PING 
 ER> support available. Helps diagnosing issues, and where they are. :)

i missed to show the next file

   ----- ping.tpl begins -----
Hi, {at}FromName!

Your message to {at}ToName was succesfuly routed via my station.

====================================================================
{at}MsgHeader
====================================================================
{at}MsgKludges

[...Body of message skipped by RNtrack...]

{at}MsgTearline
{at}MsgOrigin
{at}MsgVias

=============================== END ================================

Latest in use at {at}MyAddr:
{at}NodeLists


With best regards,
                  {at}Sysop

{at}Tearline
{at}Origin
   ----- ping.tpl ends -----

and log

   ----- log.tpl begins -----
{at}Date ===
{at}Date {at}FromName, {at}FromAddr -> {at}ToName, {at}ToAddr
{at}Date Subj: {at}Subject
{at}Date ID  : {at}MsgID
{at}Date Date: {at}MsgDate
{at}Date Size: {at}MsgSize
{at}Date Via : {at}MsgVias
{at}Date ===
   ----- log.tpl ends -----

if i remember had not changed more tpl files from the original

i plan to use it again, but still have not understand how to make it
replace what hpt does, or how to keep them away from step on each other
when both are in use


 Regards Benny

... there can only be one way of life, and it works :)

--- Msged/LNX 6.2.0 (Linux/4.2.0-gentoo-r1 (i686))