HI TOm,

On Thu 2038-Jun-03 15:47, Thom LaCosta (1:261/1352) wrote to Richard Webb:

 RW> I note the eltag.txt file is empty in 1006 except for the
 RW> header.

TL> Not sure why that happened...thanks for the heads up.

Yep, thought you'd want a heads up on that.


 RW> Obviously since you're reading and posting here routed
 RW> netmail to you isn't functioning either.  I"m not playing
 RW> games with email blacklists etc. to communicate with a
 RW> fidonet system regarding a fidonet function.  I will
 RW> continue to send routed fidonet mail however.

TL> Thats up to you....since I get echomail and routed netmail from the
TL> same place...and I am seeing the echomail, I can only assume your
TL> routed netmail ain't getting through....you could always check your
TL> uplink and ask them to see if they can discover a problem between
TL> you and them or them and the rest of the system.

YEp, and I"m sure my routed netmail went along echomail
lines.  My uplink feeds same place you do, note the path
lines.

TL> As far as you not using email....that is your choice.  If you are
TL> stubborn enough to not use modern technology and the old technoloy
TL> is busted...then who am I to tell you what to do.

I'm not wrestling with bellsouth's on again off again
blacklisting bs.  THIs is fidonet, and supposedly your
echolist is a fidonet function.  IF it's mainly a familynet
function then make it a familynet function.  IF it is truly
a fidonet function it should be reachable by fidonet.


TL> If your updates are not timely and the listing lapses because you
TL> refuse to use technology that works, please don't complain to me.
TL>  
IT really doesn't matter, I note there are backbone echoes
that aren't listed in your echolist, so I don't think it
matters a whole bunch at this point.  Ask ROy Witt?


           Richard
--- timEd 1.10.y2k+