MB> LEE ARONER wrote in a message to GEORGE FLIGER:
LA> You would only see it if locking calls were being made
LA> from the clients, across the wire. If your DBMS runs on
LA> the server and all locks are placed from the server, you
LA> won't see any affect.
MB> Also, however, you will not see problems if you are running software such
as
> Microsoft Access or Borland/Corel Paradox that expects oportunistic
locking.
Actually, I know of at least one instance of an Access DB that
was experiencing corruption. In that case, turning off OpLocks
cured the problem, but resulted in a significant decrease in
apparent bandwidth.
The problem really has nothing to do with whether the application
is "expecting" op locks, it's just plain buggy code by Novell.
LRA
-- SPEED 2.00 #2720: What if there were no hypothetical situations?
--- Platinum Xpress/Win/Wildcat5! v2.0
---------------
* Origin: Memory Alpha - (253) 859-6200 (1:343/311)
|