Hello ROSS!

Just including today, I have seen message replies from you in which your
tone was adversarial and full of name calling, even though the messages you
replied to were not insulting you, other than to contain disagreement to
your position.

While you do receive alot of this directed towards you, it is evident that
you start it, feed it and continue it, I seriously doubt your "I dont
initiate, I retaliate" modis operandi is accurate and it never was. If
it was ever accurate, you would be debating nicely when not confronted with
hostility, this is clearly not the case. Instead, to disagree with you
automatically makes that person a moron, a dummy, a "fake" or
whatever.

Disagreeing with the high and mighty Ross Sauer is not against the law on
any level and if you cannot tolerate disagreement with your positions, then
perhaps you ought to disqualify yourself from debating such hot topics as
politics, religion or otherwise.

To employ your logic, its ok for you to disagree with everyone, but its not
ok for others to disagree with you, is this accurate?

I want you to outline to the echo the proper way to debate with you so that
everyone wont piss you off by having the audacity to disagree with you?

In the meantime if you are not confronted by hostility (you have leeway
here if otherwise), I want you to stop the name calling and it will stop
NOW!

I dont care if you think it unfair or you want to call me incompetent or
whatever, stop the name calling and stop it now.


--- GoldED+/W32 1.1.5-30413