> Just including today, I have seen message replies from you in which your tone
>was adversarial and full of name calling, even though the messages you replied
>to were not insulting you, other than to contain disagreement to your position
>While you do receive alot of this directed towards you, it is evident that you
> start it, feed it and continue it, I seriously doubt your "I dont
initiate, I
> retaliate" modis operandi is accurate and it never was. If it was ever
>accurate, you would be debating nicely when not confronted with hostility, thi
>is clearly not the case. Instead, to disagree with you automatically makes tha
> person a moron, a dummy, a "fake" or whatever.
> Disagreeing with the high and mighty Ross Sauer is not against the law on any
>level and if you cannot tolerate disagreement with your positions, then perhap
> you ought to disqualify yourself from debating such hot topics as politics,
> religion or otherwise.
>To employ your logic, its ok for you to disagree with everyone, but its not ok
> for others to disagree with you, is this accurate?
> I want you to outline to the echo the proper way to debate with you so that
> everyone wont piss you off by having the audacity to disagree with you?
>In the meantime if you are not confronted by hostility (you have leeway here i
> otherwise), I want you to stop the name calling and it will stop NOW!
> I dont care if you think it unfair or you want to call me incompetent or
> whatever, stop the name calling and stop it now.

Oh, and I'm supposed to just sit back and let the Sewer Slugs, including
you, call *ME* names?
Including Mimi suggesting now TWICE that I'm going to kill myself?

Now either you do your fucking job as a moderator, and not an incompetent
partisan jackass, or take your echo here and shove it up your ass.

--- BBBS/LiI v4.01 Flag