> > A school system in the NE US even admitted as much.  A parent attempted to
> > read passages from a book from his elementary school aged kid's school
> > library at a board of education meeting.  The board cut him off stating
> > that "reading pornography" during a meeting was not allowed.

> > "Pornography" was their word, not the parent's.

> That is not happening in Canada and I would be surprised if it is happening in
> the US. If such material slipped through the cracks it can be removed.

> If this was pointed out to a librarian it would be removed. Or am I wrong?

Im past, yes.  In the current climate, it would depend on what it was.  If
it is a book that depicts (with non-scientific illustrations) two young
boys sexually experimenting on each other, it very well might not be
removed.

If it is a boy and a girl then, yes, it probably will be.

> > Leftist generally don't like it when you bring up China being a reason that
> > certain forms of racism are tolerated while other, non-racist things get
> > labeled "racist."

> Bring up China as you need. China is a deeply racist country. China's racism i
> a reality, not much to be done about it. I dunno, but I don't think China want
> to talk about it, or much of anything at all.

I agree with your statements.  That said, being as racist as they are, we
should not allow them to dictate to us what is racist or not as they
obviously don't have a clue.


 * SLMR 2.1a * I open a door to an empty room...then I forget...
--- SBBSecho 3.20-Linux