BK> TW> EVEN if it haf of gone up since it is a pure Piramid schems
BK> TW> with todays contributors paying yesterdays reciepients it
BK> TW> brequires an EVER expanding Population. THAT IS NOT
BK> TW> possable. Like ALL piramid schemes at soem pint it falls
BK> TW> under its' own weight. THE Bacic Principle is FLAWED.

BK> Nope. A stable base is enough. Since the working life is much
BK> longer than the social security life, it's quite possible to
BK> make it work without a growing population. We do, however, need
BK> for that working population to be working, not unemployed.

Wel lthe Ptramid is UPSIDE Down  with 3 or sop payers for each
Recipient. DO the Math!!!! For the system to be stable with an
approxmently $1200 per reciepined then the Workers(including the
Employer Matching Contribution) SHOULD be Paying $400 PER Month.
JUST how much Social Secirity do you PAY per Month?
---
 þ SLMR 2.1a þ 0