Hey Maurice!

 MK> From this angle it is definetly ISO-8859-1 as the above characters
 MK> show.

While in the editor it was true for all 3 but after saving and viewing it
online the 3rd character was altered to "1" which it is here as
well.  Beats me what went wrong but on the plus side it was 66%
'successful' and did confirm our suspicions about so-called LATIN-1 in
BBBS's view of that particular BS.

What a crock.  :-/

Life is good,
Maurice

... Don't cry for me I have vi.
--- GNU bash, version 4.4.12(1)-release (x86_64-bonnell-linux-gnu)