Efficiencies for them is typically 90% and up, unless you _need_ a
sinewave
for some reason, so it doesn't amount to all that much.
RS> I believe that the larger ones waste more than the smaller ones
RS> do.
What are you basing this on? I don't recall having heard anything to this
effect before.
Hope you don't mind my butting in here. I am an electrical contractor
dealing largely with RE systems. My personal experience is mostly with
Trace inverters, as they appear to be the most popular, and by my
experience, the most reliable. (I didn't mean that to sound like a
commercial, it just happened). They claim 90 percent efficiency in the
"modified sine" (actually modified square) inverters. I have worked with
inverters that were less effiecient. Also, the "true sine" inverters are
less efficient, though the numbers climb a bit each year. A modified sine
will do for most things, including computers (but not laser printers).
Lately many RE homes are wired only for AC, through an inverter. The
advantages include use of standard connectors and circuit protection
equipment (except for the batteries), as well as smaller wire (much less
$$). My personal preference is to include at least two DC circuits for
lighting in any case. Just because it is still possible that your inverter
may break down at some point (Never trust a machine 100 percent).
--- FLAME v1.1
---------------
* Origin: Home Power BBS - Renewables R Us (707) 822-8640 (1:2002/442)
|