BK>>TW>>They WHY are the Liberals Sweating Bullets and puling
out theri hair
BK>>TW>>over how to "SAVE" Social Secutriy which is
bacicly bankrupt whith only
BK>>TW>>TWO perople paying in to suport the system?"?

BK>> AH> Because the age of eligibility for Social Security and
BK>> AH> Medicare didn't go up, while life spans did.  *adh*

BK>> And so did productivity, so the reasoning is specious at best.
BK>> The better choice is to keep unemployment down to 4% or lower,
BK>> and shift a few other things around, but that would have
BK>> political dangers.

 TW> More Klahn Mumbo Jumbo.
 TW> Incresed productivity by the line worker DOES NOT raise his
 TW> Salary and Obviously does not raise what he pays in social
 TW> security Taxes.

 Increased productivity means more is produced, so more people
 can be supported by fewer workers. As it is we can probably now
 produce all that is necessary with maybe 25% of our workforce.
 All the rest produce wants, not needs.

 Reread again where I said, keep unemployment below 4%. Low
 unemployment combined with high productivity means our society
 can support the retired with little difficulty.

 Then again, low unemployment means more of the elderly are
 likely to be working, at least part time. A great many of the
 retired go out and find second jobs. I see a lot of our retired
 come back as instructors or consultants.

 TW> SO just WHERE is the help for the Crushing load of TOO many
 TW> Receivers and TO Few Payers in that Liberal jiber jaber???.

 More productivity means no crushing load. The money flow is
 based on the production of goods and services. Increase the
 production and you have more to allow more money flow. In the
 end, it's all paid out of what is produced.


BOB KLAHN bob.klahn{at}sev.org   http://home.toltbbs.com/bobklahn

... At a funeral dinner the honoree does not eat.
 * Silver Xpress V4.5/P [Reg]
--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr5a