AH>>TW>They WHY are the Liberals Sweating Bullets and puling out theri hair
AH>>TW>over how to "SAVE" Social Secutriy which is
bacicly bankrupt whith only
AH>>TW>TWO perople paying in to suport the system?"?

AH>>Because the age of eligibility for Social Security and Medicare didn't
AH>>go up, while life spans did.  *adh*

 TW> EVEN if it haf of gone up since it is a pure Piramid schems
 TW> with todays contributors paying yesterdays reciepients it
 TW> brequires an EVER expanding Population. THAT IS NOT
 TW> possable. Like ALL piramid schemes at soem pint it falls
 TW> under its' own weight. THE Bacic Principle is FLAWED.

 Nope. A stable base is enough. Since the working life is much
 longer than the social security life, it's quite possible to
 make it work without a growing population. We do, however, need
 for that working population to be working, not unemployed.



BOB KLAHN bob.klahn{at}sev.org   http://home.toltbbs.com/bobklahn

... Parody is always good for a laugh... or a truth...
 * Silver Xpress V4.5/P [Reg]
--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr5a