Hi Mark!

Nov 09 11:16 2018, mark lewis wrote to Andrew Leary:

 AL>> FTS-1 really could be split into several documents.  The stored
 AL>> message definition section is useful information, but not absolutely
 AL>> required for a FTS-1 compatible implementation.

 ml> this is why other proposals like the Hudson Message Base format and 
 ml> others were discussed to be placed as reference documents in the 
 ml> library and specifically not set as FTSC standards... putting them in 
 ml> the library was to aid others as to the workings of them but not to 
 ml> exhibit them as a FTSC standard... i remember discussion about it but 
 ml> do not recall if the documents were actually written and archived...

AFAIK, there aren't any of the messagebase formats in the FTSC library, besides
classic *.MSG.  

ciao,
Markus

---